Module 4 Graded Assignment 1.5 pages, 3 referencesCase Analysis 2: Corporate ValuationThe objective of this case analysis to apply the concepts presented in this module to determine the value of a corporation. The professor will provide examples to help students complete this case analysis correctly.Part 1: Complete the integrated problem (11-14) in the chapter titled “Risk-Adjusted Expected Rates of Return and the Dividends Valuation Approach”https://courses.campbellsville.edu/pluginfile.php/3069172/mod_resource/content/0/Mod-4-RiskAdjustedModel.pdfPart 2: Complete the integrated problem (12-17) in the chapter titled “Valuation: Cash-Flow-Based Approaches”https://courses.campbellsville.edu/pluginfile.php/3069173/mod_resource/content/0/Mod-4-CashFlowModel.pdfDue Date: Submit both parts of Case Analysis 2 in one document. Use APA throughout. Case Analysis 2 is due no later than the last day (Sunday) of week 4.Module 6 Graded Assignment 1.5 pages, 3 referencesCase Analysis 3: Long-term Financing, Mergers and AcquisitionsPart 1: Complete Integrated Case 20-14. Case is located in the Hybrid Financial chapter of your textbook.https://courses.campbellsville.edu/pluginfile.php/3069203/mod_resource/content/1/Module%206%20Hybrid%20Financing.pdfPart 2: Complete Integrated Case 21-8. Case is located in the Mergers and Acquisitions chapter of your textbook.https://courses.campbellsville.edu/pluginfile.php/3069201/mod_resource/content/1/Module%206%20Mergers%20and%20Acquisitions.pdfDue Date: Submit both parts of the Case Analysis in one document. Use APA throughout. Case Analysis is due no later than the last day (Sunday) of week 6.Module 8 Graded Assignment 1.5 pages, 3 referencesCase Analysis 4: Corporate Tax Return and Tax ResearchPart 2: Tax ResearchSubject: Repayment agreement between the Merinoffs and Flamingo CorporationFacts: Kenny and John Merinoff are the sole shareholders of Flamingo Corporation. They are also officers of the corporation and members of the board of directors. In 2008, the Merinoffs entered into a repayment agreement with Flamingo, which stipulated that they would reimburse the corporation for any salary that was subsequently disallowed as a deduction by the IRS. In late 2014, the IRS recharacterized $350,000 of John’s 2013 salary and $400,000 of Kenny’s 2013 salary as constructive dividends, disallowing Flamingo’s compensation deduction for these amounts. Pursuant to the 2008 agreement, Kenny and John repaid the amount disallowed to Flamingo in 2015.Issues: How should the repayment by Kenny and John be treated for income tax purposes?Provide a complete response to the issues in this case. Provide appropriate supporting references including applicable IRS code.Due Date: Due to the nature of this assignment, you need to submit two different files: one for Part 1 and another one for Part 2. This assignment is due no later than day 7 (Sunday) of week 8.For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now